//emails-for-saas providers ↗
← Brevo
alternatives

Brevo alternatives

Providers that compete with Brevo on at least one of: Transactional Marketing

All-in-one with a generous daily free tier.

Switching as SaaS product teams

A SaaS product sends on behalf of its customers, so the deciding factors are tenant isolation, whether suppressions can be scoped rather than global, and whether support can answer why one specific account did not receive one specific email. Lifecycle automation and transactional sending usually need to coexist.

Brevo does not cover multi-tenant support and operating track record. Elastic Email, Customer.io, and SendGrid close that gap. The order below weighs this audience's priorities first, so it differs from a general popularity ranking.

ranked for SaaS product teams

  1. 01

    Elastic Email

    Transactional Marketing

    Low-cost email API and SMTP relay with marketing features nearby.

    Adds multi-tenant support over Brevo, with nothing given up on these priorities.

    $0/mo test plan with limited sending only to yourself · $19/mo for Email API up to 50,000 emails/mo
  2. 02

    Customer.io

    Marketing Transactional

    Behavior-driven lifecycle messaging.

    Adds multi-tenant support over Brevo, with nothing given up on these priorities.

    No permanent free tier; trial only · $100/mo (Essentials)
  3. 03

    SendGrid

    Transactional Marketing

    Twilio-owned veteran with broad SDK coverage.

    Adds multi-tenant support over Brevo, with nothing given up on these priorities.

    60-day free trial only (permanent free tier was removed May 2025) · $19.95/mo for 50,000 emails
  4. 04

    Mailjet

    Transactional Marketing

    European-focused, GDPR-friendly all-in-one.

    Adds multi-tenant support over Brevo, with nothing given up on these priorities.

    6,000/mo (200/day cap) permanent · $17/mo for 15,000 emails
  5. 05

    Loops

    Marketing Transactional

    Modern lifecycle and broadcast email for SaaS.

    Matches Brevo on every priority weighed here, so the decision is price and preference.

    1,000 contacts and 4,000 sends/mo on the Free plan · $49/mo for 5,000 contacts
  6. 06

    Plunk

    Self-hosted Marketing

    Open-source unified email platform.

    Matches Brevo on every priority weighed here, so the decision is price and preference.

    3,000/mo on hosted free plan · $19/mo or self-host
  7. 07

    SendPulse

    Transactional Marketing

    Marketing suite with a generous transactional SMTP tier.

    Matches Brevo on every priority weighed here, so the decision is price and preference.

    12,000 transactional emails/mo on SMTP Basic, 50 messages/hour · $15 pay-as-you-go for 10,000 emails, or $74.85/mo monthly for Pro 100,000
  8. 08

    Mailchimp / Mandrill

    Marketing Transactional

    Legacy marketing giant, transactional via Mandrill.

    Matches Brevo on every priority weighed here, so the decision is price and preference.

    500 contacts, 1,000 sends/month · $13/mo Essentials

Brevo and its alternatives, side by side

Columns are the priorities SaaS product teams weigh, in order. Brevo is the first row so the trade in each direction is readable at a glance.

ProviderMulti-tenantEvent streamSuppressions APIOperating sinceSchedulingBest published rate per 1,000Webhooks
BrevoNoYesYes2012YesTiers not published in comparable formYes
Elastic EmailYesYesYesNot publishedYesTiers not published in comparable formYes
Customer.ioYesYesYes2012YesTiers not published in comparable formYes
SendGridYesYesYes2009Yes$0.40Yes
MailjetYesYesYesNot publishedYesTiers not published in comparable formYes
LoopsNoYesYes2022YesTiers not published in comparable formYes
PlunkNoYesYesNot publishedYesTiers not published in comparable formYes
SendPulseNoYesYesNot publishedYesTiers not published in comparable formYes
Mailchimp / MandrillNoYesYesNot publishedYesTiers not published in comparable formYes

Elastic Email, Customer.io, and SendGrid add capability without giving anything up on these priorities. The rest trade one thing for another.

All provider alternatives →